HELLO! My name is Adina Adil and Welcome to my Final or Advanced Portfolio Blog where I’ve compiled my research, production and final work. Apart from interest in Videography and Photography, I am a debater and love traveling. Hoping that Media will make me confident, enhance my videography skills and will help me to achieve my goals.
THE WOLF OF WALL STREET – (L-R): Margot Robbie as Naomi Lapaglia and Leonardo DiCaprio as Jordan Belfort – 2013 FILM STILL – Courtesy of Paramount Pictures
Laura Mulvey is a feminist film theorist from Britain, best known for her essay on Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Her theories are influenced by the likes of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan (by using their ideologies as “political weapons”) whilst also including psychoanalysis and feminism in her works. Mulvey is predominantly known for her theory regarding sexual objectification on women in the media, more commonly known as The Male Gaze” theory.
Being one of the most notable film theorists in the world, her ideas and clear proof of misogyny in film opened up the eyes of many, and in 1975, something that people simply accepted was finally questioned. Although Mulvey‘s theory has helped identify issues with gender in film, why do we still have the same issues decades later? Why do we still see the same roles for women in film and television regurgitated over and over again?
Mulvey states that “the gender power asymmetry is a controlling force in cinema and constructed for the pleasure of the male viewer, which is deeply rooted in patriarchal ideologies and discourses.” This means that the male viewer is the target audience, therefore their needs are met first and that this problem stems from an old fashioned, male-driven society. Her theory on how women are portrayed in film and the media is just as prevalent today as it was in 1975 when her text was first published.
Mulvey believes that women are in fact “the bearer of meaning and not the maker of meaning,” which suggests that women are not placed in a role where they can take control of a scene, instead they are simply put there to be observed from an objectified point of view. In addition, she believes that this way of watching film is never alternated so that the men are in fact the ones who are being viewed in this manner. This inequality enforces the ancient and outdated idea of “men do the looking, and women are to be looked at.”
THE FIRST THING I DID WAS FADING THE BACKGROUND PICTURE AND ADDING THE TITLES TO THE MOVIE.AT THIS PLACE, I COLOR CORRECTED THIS CLIP AND ENHANCED THE COLORS.I ADDED WARP STABILIZERS HERE AND COLOR CORRECTED THIS CLIP AS WELLI ADDED WARP STABILIZERS HERE AND ZOOM IN THE CLIPI COLOR CORRECTED THIS CLIP AND ADDED DRIP TO BLACK DISSOLVETIME LAPSE AND TICK SOUND WAS ADDED.ADDED FADES AND COLOR CORRECTED THIS CLIPIT WAS LONG SHOT HENCE I ADDED THE WARP STABILIZER HERE BECAUSE THIS SHOT WAS LITTLE UNSTABLE. I ALSO ADDED NON DIEGETIC AND DIEGETIC SOUNDS. COLOR GRADING WAS DONE IN THIS CLIP BECAUSE IT WAS GIVING VERY DARK IMPACTREACTIONS WERE RECORDED HENCE WARP STABILIZERS, CROSS FADES AND OTHER EFFECTS WERE ALSO USED.HIGH PACE SOUNDS WERE USED IN ORDER TO GIVE SMOOTH EFFECTDIGETIC AND NON DIGETIC SOUNDS WERE ADDED IN THIS PART BECAUSE DIALOGUE WAS THERE.DRIP TP BLACK AND OTHER SEVERAL FADES WERE USEDI ADDED THE CLIP OF MY TITLE, WHICH I MADE ON AFTER EFFECTS AND EDITED ON PREMIER. HERE I USED THE EFFECT WHICH GIVES DISTORTED LOOK WHICH EXACTLY GOES WITH MY CONCEPT.
Several pictures were taken and color corrected for poster. Through the reference poster, the idea was taken and pictures were taken from several poses and angles.The final picture was selected because it gives psychotic look and angle was perfectly matching the concept. The colors were neutralized and the final look is given.